Really. I dived with one in febuary and found it heavy and very stiff. At the time, I really wanted to get one but after trying it, I would not recomend it to anyone.
Not sure I can stretch to one of those anyway I do now have a nice thinsulate Polar Bear undersuit though - will try that next time. M
Not that expensive....it's £1,900 lol.....I only paid £350 for a made to measure. If you want a reasonably priced warm undersuit then maybe this is an option (similar to a Weezle style quilted suit)... http://www.divingshop.com/products/oceanic-uggi-undersuit-one-piece-mens-small-mens-small-13301.aspx Personally I find that it means increased weighting and prefer to go for the thinsulate type of suit....loving my Fourth Element Xerotherms right now and hoping that I can get more dives out of them before it gets too cold as they are less restricting and not overly buoyant.... http://www.divelife.co.uk/product_info.php?products_id=4012 I would suggest that the undersuit requirements would control your temperature more than the dry suit itself....I wouldn't advise spending a fortune on another tri-lam as I don't think it will make as much difference as getting a good warm wicking layer underneath. HTH mate
